Staphylococcus aureus is a common little bug and a normal part of skin flora.
It is the culprit in what are known as staph infections. Staph can also be at the root of more life-threatening diseases like pneumonia, endocarditis, and sepsis. When S. aureus develops a resistance to antibiotic treatment, it becomes a problematic and virulent infective agent known as Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, more commonly referred to as MRSA.
A study was released this month with a shocking headline: Multidrug-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in United States Meat and Poultry.
This study is actually the first of its kind to show that American food supply carries a high prevalence of antibiotic resistant S. aureus.
A team of researchers visited five cities in the United States - Flagstaff, Chicago, Fort Lauderdale, Los Angeles, and Washington, DC - and purchased 136 packages of:
These were bought under 80 brand names and in 26 different supermarkets. The team then went to work. They did three rounds of testing. The first looked for the presence of staph, the second was to identify which strain of staph was present, and the third tested the staph isolate against five classes of antibiotics.
What they found:
Before you reach for that hamburger... Did you know that up to 47% of commercial meat products could contain multi-drug resistant staph bacteria?
The meat samples, according to the type of animal, had a tendency to carry the same strain of staph.
For example, turkey, which had the highest percentage of antibiotic resistant S. aureus at 77%, carried the sequence type ST398.
Lance Price, who led the research team, notes that because each meat and poultry type had its own distinctive type of staph, it "provides strong evidence that food animals were the primary source of the resistant staph. The source wasn't human contamination of the meat at slaughter, or when it was packaged for retail sale."
The S. aureus isolates found in meat samples had resistance to the following antibiotics:
At the end of last year, December 2010, the FDA quietly announced for the first time an estimate of the amount of antibiotics sold for use in food animals.
In 2009, United States livestock received 29 million pounds of antibiotics.
Why are livestock receiving antibiotics, and is it appropriate to use so much?
To clarify, Dr. David Wallinga, director of the Food and Health program at the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy in Minneapolis says that,
"Antibiotic use in animal agriculture is huge, and as the FDA and CDC and WHO all agree, much of it is unnecessary. Data collection is important. But, because resistant bugs quickly adapt, we can't afford to wait for data to take action to reduce antibiotic use wherever possible. That includes routine uses of antibiotics for cattle developing liver abscesses because they're force-fed grain rather than grass, as well as antibiotics used to make animals get fatter faster."
What this means is that while antibiotic resistance is a growing point of concern in both agricultural and medical fields, so far it is too costly and time-consuming to not use them in the meat production industry. Sadly, animals that are not fed grain at any point in their production are healthier for us to eat; their meat is richer in polyunsaturated fatty acids, as well as antioxidants.
Lance Price, the microbiologist who led the meat study, emphasized that the issue is not so much food poisoning.
Rather, drug-resistant bacteria in meat present the possibility of:
Staph is problematic enough. However, these strains can also contaminate the environment and communicate to severely pathogenic bacteria their antibiotic resistance. Joshua Lederberg first noticed this phenomenon, called transduction, in 1952. Microbial transduction accounts for the exchange of genetic information between bugs and antibiotic resistance that quickly develops between species.
Body Ecology recommends always including fermented foods, made with our Culture Starter, and probiotic beverages in the diet to build the microflora in the gut and improve the body's ability to defend itself from harmful bacteria.
Information and statements regarding dietary supplements/products have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration and are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. Information on this website is provided for informational purposes only and is a result of years of practice and experience by the author. This information is not intended as a substitute for the advice provided by your physician or other healthcare professional or any information contained on or in any product label or packaging. Do not use the information on this website for diagnosing or treating a health problem or disease, or prescribing medication or other treatment. Always speak with your physician or other healthcare professional before taking any medication or nutritional, herbal, or homeopathic supplement, or using any treatment for a health problem. If you have or suspect that you have a medical problem, contact your healthcare provider promptly. Do not disregard professional medical advice or delay in seeking professional advice because of something you have read on this website.